Microteaching Task: Object-based Learning

Microteaching Task: Object-based Learning / Friday 9February 2024 / LCC T11.07

The first online seminar led by Judy Willcocks, Head of Museum & Study Collections at CSM, and Georgina Orgill, Assistant Manager of the University Archives and Special Collections introduced object-based learning as a pedagogy to explore the various ways we experience physical and digital objects. 

Judy Willcocks`s preparatory watching, thinking & doing (video on the archives and the UAL study collections and short film, Emotional Responses to Objects) prior to the Object Based Learning session provided context for the history of the Central Saint Martins Museum & Study Collection as well as addressed the multi-sensory aspects in object-based sessions and instinctive reactions to objects; how a response to an object is formed based on an individual`s disciplinary training, cultural background and/or life experience. How the exploration of the emotional or extra-rational responses to objects as a key part of experiential learning in art/design context can enhance learning awareness, encourage object analysis and critical reflection (Willcocks, 2018). References to framework which encourages deep forensic examination of objects such as methodology based on the work of Jules Prown that coined the phrase Material Culture in the 1980s and advocated a staged examination of objects through description, deduction, hypothesis and the material qualities of objects deducing from a close examination before moving on to storytelling offered a deeper understanding of the online seminar. Further reference to Perspectives on Object-Centered Learning in Museums by Scott G. Paris addressing the issue of object engagement in a museum setting, the meaning of an object not held inherently within the object itself rather a transaction between the object and the learner, Jerome Bruner`s attributed interest and curiosity as being the key motivations for learning, Lev Vygotsky`s investigation on object-oriented action, the ways humans use objects as mediation aiding in memory, reasoning and how learning is being constructed by the learner contextualised the session.

Dr Kirsten Hardie, graphic design historian and cultural theorist also refers to constructing meaning through interpretation of objects as part of process of learning, encouraging analysis and critical reflection. In a report from the Innovative Pedagogies Series, the reconsideration of the value of particular objects and university museum collections suggest how objects can be used to facilitate learning by presenting key pedagogical case studies that highlight activities created to enable and advance object-based learning (Hardie, 2015).

As a response to the online seminar, relevant contextual material and Microteaching task brief I prepared a 20 min learning activity based around an object. I approached my peers as they truly are, a group of teachers from different disciplines. I viewed the task as an opportunity to initiate a discussion by showing an object in an interdisciplinary way on the assumption that the focus on object engagement isn`t necessary discipline specific but rooted to own experience, visual literacy (ability to read objects and find meaning from them), critical/analytical skills and aesthetic judgment.

I used Judy Willcocks`s Emotional or Extra-rational Reading of an Object questions as an exercise that encourages the readers/participants to be self-aware, explore their inner world and question their habituated responses to objects.

THE DIGITAL SOANE was a competition initiated by the Royal College of Art Jewellery & Metal alumni to create a series of pieces for Sir John Soane`s Museum to enhance digital techniques in craft.  

3D scanning specialists scanned the museum’s bust of Sir John Soane using hand-held equipment before 3D before 3d printing it and digitally fragmented it. The fragmented pieces were then used as the starting for the creation of a new object by the RCA Jewellery & Metal alumni through the programme`s Thinking Digital Initiative in 2014. The digital fragments 3D printed in various materials were given to the participants of the competition that we re-interpreted them into a range of outcomes to the displayed and potentially sold at the museum’s shop.

My response was to recreate my Fragment (back of Sir John Soane`s head) in a piece of wood, washed up from the shore of the river Thames. I took inspiration from Soane`s Design from a bridge named Triumphal Bridge across the Thames that won the Royal Academy gold medal in 1776. The accolade was a milestone in Soane`s career as led to a scholarship to travel to Italy for 3 years. It was during this period that his close friend and fellow student James King had drowned on a boating trip to Greenwich. Soane, a non-swimmer, was going to be with him but decided to stay home and work on his design for a Triumphal Bridge.

The architectural drawing and this serendipitous incident are piecing together a narrative comparable with the fragmented nature of Sir john`s digitally “shattered” bust originally made by Francis Chantrey and the nature of the museum housing not only drawings, architectural models of Soane`s projects, large collection of paintings, sculptures, antiquities but also curious objects such a large sea fungus, a skeleton, a plaster beaver, a bent twig, a lock of Napoleon`s hair preserved in a ring. The film A Triumphal Bridge and a Boating Trip to Greenwich in 1776 and in 2014 shows process, how Soane`s fragment of his bust is digitally reproduced (CNC milled) on the surface of drift wood sourced from the Thames foreshore is an attempt to tell the story of an object. The Thames is here considered as a museum, composed of a plethora of flotsam and jetsam objects, mingled together with objects from all periods; a democratic coexistence of objects subjected to chance.

Once out of context the object is released from its history, the marble bust, Soane`s home, a part of a body, the proximity to something intimate as human hair. Bare from associations the driftwood was presented to my peers. I referred to the story behind the object and based on Judy Willcocks`s Emotional or extra-rational reading of an object exercise I asked my peers to reflect on their immediate reaction to the object, their emotional, physical responses, what the object reminded them of, made them think of, how does that influenced the way they encountered the object, if they could relate this object to themselves or their lives, how and/or if triggered their imagination, if they felt comfortable touching an object sourced from the Thames foreshore:

“Sir John Soane`s Museum. I really like the experimental story telling, being able to physically interact, feel and hold something that holds a piece of history feels incredibly novel. Even the wood feels as if it is historic. Embedding the fragment into something that has endured some horrific conditions.”
“At first I felt the object was organic, but didn`t know why. It had gravitas, mystery. Intriguing blend of natural + manmade (CNC marks). Scared to touch it. The story telling demystified the object! Made it much more approachable to me. The ‘slotting in’ of the fragment actually reminded me of video games, like it was a key. It also felt like a brain > the waves / whorls.”
“History. The past is now in the present. Totally changed into something else. Wood rooted. Tear. Throwing stones in Thames. Iced over. 1800`s reportage. John Soane climbs down onto the sandbanks. Ends-up dragged out of the Thames.”
“After listening context of history I felt intrigued about the rational behind. I felt strongly to touch the top part of the piece.”
“I like the texture. The splinters are ____ – broken. The broken bust feels like the end of something great – How tall.”
“Mysterious like peeking in – the story gives it far more meaning and substance.”

References:

Hardie K. (2015) Wow: the power of objects in object-based learning and teaching: Innovative Pedagogies Series. Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/kirsten_hardie_final_1568037367.pdf

Willcocks J. (2018) Central Saint Martins Museum & Study Collection: Object-based learning and the modern art school curriculum. Judy Willcocks Copenhagen Presentation. University of the Arts London. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3O7MM5WuFo

Willcocks J. (2021) Central Saint Martins Museum & Study Collection: Emotional Responses to Objects. University of the Arts London. Available at: https://arts.ac.libguides.com/c.php?g=686452&p=4906489

Further References/Reading:

Artech 3D (2014) The Digital Soane: How Artec 3D scanners bring together new technologies and contemporary art. Available at: https://www.artec3d.com/news/digital-soane-how-artec-3d-scanners-bring-together-new-technologies

Google/Wikipedia Entry (2024) John Soane. Available at:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Soane

Hidden Architecture (no date) Triumphal Bridge. Available at: https://hiddenarchitecture.net/triumphal-bridge/

Lever J. (2005) Sir John Soane`s Museum Collection Online: Rough preliminary designs, some attributed to George Dance, and design ‘for a Mausoleum to the Memory of James King drowned June 9. 1776’ , 1776-7, with J.M.Gandy perspectives, 1799-1800 (19). Available at: https://collections.soane.org/drawings?ci_search_type=ARCI&mi_search_type=adv&sort=7&tn=Drawings&t=SCHEME117

Militsi M. (2014) Digital Soane: A Triumphal Bridge and a Boating Trip to Greenwich in 1776 and in 2014. Available at: https://vimeo.com/110061495

Sir John Soane`s Museum (2007) A New Description of Sir John Soane`s Museum. Sir John Soane`s Museum 11th Revised Edition

Summerson J. (1978) The Architectural Review: John Soane and the Furniture of Death. Available at: https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/john-soane-and-the-furniture-of-death

This entry was posted in Uncategorised. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *